In [1], the following problem is stated:
- There is a collection of \(n=1,000\) test questions.
- Each question covers a number of skills.
- Given is a requirement for a number of questions for each required skill (e.g., 4 questions about skill 1, 3 questions about skill 2, etc.).
- Create a test with the minimum number of questions that fulfills the requirements.
Of course, we see some remarks about NP-Hardness. Complexity theory is about bounds, about worst-case and asymptotic behavior. Even if we can't prove that a particular problem with a particular dataset given to a particular solver must be fast, it does not mean the opposite: that it must be slow. It is not at all unusual that we can solve things very quickly, even though the complexity bounds are terrible. Of course, this depends on the model, on the data set, and on the solver. Here, we see an open-source MIP solver can solve this particular problem in less than 0.01 seconds. Many well-educated people misunderstand complexity theory – to their detriment. They miss out on great ways to solve actual problems! Obviously, this is a problem with how complexity theory is taught.